Which of my fixed fee agreements are under-performing and why?
Overview
The document provides a guide for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) on analyzing and improving the profitability of their fixed fee agreements through various performance reports and metrics.
Key Points:
-
Identifying Under-Performing Agreements:
- The FFA/Monthly Tracking report helps quickly identify agreements needing attention by comparing expected hours to actual hours spent.
- Negative delta hours indicate over-utilization, while positive delta hours suggest under-utilization and potential flight risks.
-
Understanding Efficiency Drivers:
- The Agreement Drill Down report under the Efficiencies tab provides a detailed look at the efficiency ratio, which compares labor revenue to the value of work delivered (shadow billable).
- Factors impacting efficiency include the level of engineer, amount invoiced, and utilization (hours per ticket and tickets per node).
-
Historical Performance Analysis:
- The Agreement Specifics report in the Dashboard tab offers a historical perspective on agreement efficiency, including insights from the Ticket Concentration and Tickets by Configuration reports.
-
Improving Resource Allocation:
- The Efficiency by Agreement report helps verify proper time allocation and identify clients over-utilizing services, allowing us to refine resource allocation and address inefficiencies.
By leveraging these reports, you can gain actionable insights to enhance service delivery, improve profitability, and ensure accurate billing.
0 Comments
Add your comment